Tuesday, Jun 10, 2025 23:30 [IST]
Last Update: Monday, Jun 09, 2025 17:59 [IST]
The vulnerability
of Sikkim’s principal arterial road, NH 10, stands exposed—yet again. With the
monsoons approaching, the state stares at the grim prospect of being cut off
from the rest of the country, as it has been every monsoon since last two
decades. More than just a road, NH 10 is Sikkim’s economic and social lifeline.
And yet, its continued fragility—worsened by natural disasters, unchecked
infrastructure works, and sluggish institutional response—raises serious questions
about our national priorities for the Northeast and the fragile Himalayas.
The High Court of
Sikkim’s recent intervention in a PIL underscores a systemic failure in
balancing development with accountability. The under-construction Sevoke-Rangpo
railway line, which promises improved connectivity, has ironically compounded
the crisis by destabilising NH 10’s drainage infrastructure. As reported by
Amicus Curiae Tashi Rapten Barfungpa, IRCON’s construction activities have led
to clogged culverts, slush-covered surfaces, and blocked drains—jeopardising
road safety and worsening flood vulnerability.
The Court’s sharp
rebuke of IRCON—warning of personal liability for officers—should not merely be
seen as legal warning but as an urgent call to re-evaluate the way national
infrastructure projects are executed in ecologically sensitive zones. The lack
of coordination between agencies like IRCON and NHIDCL only exacerbates the
chaos on the ground. The people of Sikkim pay the price.
It is unacceptable
that a state’s only highway to the rest of the country can be virtually
unusable for most parts of the year. The October 2023 Teesta flash floods,
which drastically altered river morphology, exposed the structural inadequacies
of NH 10, especially the Melli–Teesta Bazaar stretch. Even now, ongoing repair
and strengthening work often restricts traffic movement—delaying goods,
emergency services, and isolating communities. In times of medical emergencies,
food shortages, or disaster relief, this disconnect can be fatal.
What Sikkim
urgently needs is not patchwork repair but a strategic vision: the construction
of a robust, all-weather alternate national highway that can serve as a
dependable backup. This must be complemented by long-term investment in
climate-resilient infrastructure, strict monitoring of all construction
projects near sensitive terrain, and seamless coordination among government
agencies and contractors.
Connectivity
cannot remain hostage to negligence or nature. The state’s geographical
isolation demands smarter, stronger, and more inclusive infrastructure
planning—one that prioritises not just access, but resilience. Anything less is
a betrayal of the people of Sikkim and the promises of equitable development.