



















Thursday, Aug 06, 2026 10:00 [IST]
Last Update: Thursday, Aug 06, 2026 04:19 [IST]
NEW
DELHI, (IANS): Meta on Wednesday apologised for the temporary restriction
of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook post, with the company's Chief
Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan saying the apology was conveyed directly to
Union Electronics and Information Technology Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw.
"I
apologised to the minister on behalf of Meta for the error restricting PM
Modi's post," Kaplan said in a statement shared by the company with NDTV.
Kaplan
was part of a global Meta delegation that met Vaishnaw on Wednesday, during
which the company acknowledged lapses in the functioning of its platforms.
The
delegation also held separate discussions with IT Secretary S. Krishnan ahead
of the ministerial meeting.
The
latest apology comes amid heightened scrutiny of Meta's operations in India
after concerns were raised over content moderation and the brief restriction of
the Prime Minister's Facebook post.
Earlier
in the day, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg also apologised over the spread of child
sexual abuse material (CSAM), deepfake content and shortcomings in the
operation of the company's platforms, according to government sources.
Sources
said Zuckerberg acknowledged concerns raised by the government regarding the
spread of objectionable and manipulated content and expressed regret over what
were described as errors in the operation of the platform.
Government
sources further claimed that authorities conveyed to Meta that its role in
selecting and distributing content to users could place it outside the
definition of a neutral intermediary under Indian law.
According
to the sources, officials made it clear that the "safe harbour"
protections available under the Information Technology Act may not apply if a
platform is found to be actively determining which content reaches users.
"It
was made clear to them that they are not covered under the intermediary
definition. They select who receives the content. Safe harbour under the IT Act
not applicable. They admitted that a lot of money was paid for boosting certain
types of content. They apologised and regretted the mistake," the sources
said.