Sparrows, Famine, and China’s Giant Leap

Dr. Vidhu Prakash Kayastha

No Victory Over Nature:

The world’s deadliest environmental disaster began in China in 1958. It wasn’t just an environmental disaster—it was a tragedy of human suffering. The tragedy, which began with the eradication of sparrows, led to mass starvation and even violence.

Nine years after the Communist Party took power in China in 1958, Chinese leader Mao Zedong launched “the Giant Leap”. His goal was to rapidly industrialize China. But to realize this vision, sweeping changes were needed. This included the collectivization of agriculture. At the same time, China began the Four Pests Campaign.

The Four Pests Campaign was launched in 1958 as a public health and environmental initiative in the early years of the People’s Republic of China. Its goal was to eradicate pests that were considered a threat to public health and agricultural production. The Four Pests Campaign was a public health and environmental initiative in the early years of the People's Republic of China in 1958. Its goal was to eliminate pests that were considered a threat to both public health and agricultural productivity. The campaign targeted the following four pests, dubbed the "Four Pests":

•        Flies: Flies were seen as carriers of disease.

•        Mosquitoes: Mosquitoes were believed to spread diseases such as malaria.

•        ??Rats: Rats were seen as pests that destroyed crops and spread disease.

•        Sparrows: Sparrows were believed to be eating too much grain and damaging crops.

The campaign was part of a broader effort to improve sanitation, increase agricultural production, and promote industrial and agricultural progress. Its objectives were related to China's overall progress and development. For that, it was necessary to increase agricultural production. The campaign to eliminate the "Four Pests" was launched to meet those objectives. Through this campaign, Chinese citizens were involved in efforts to create a clean and healthy environment and increase agricultural production. Although the intentions of this campaign were good, China suffered terrible consequences when the campaign organizers did not understand the long-term consequences. The most controversial aspect of this campaign was the targeting of sparrows. Sparrows were mainly seen as damaging agricultural production and damaging crops by eating grain seeds. For this reason, sparrows were considered a “pest” like other pests. Citizens were involved in special tasks with the aim of reducing the number of sparrows, which led to the misuse and extreme cruelty of the campaign.

A significant part of their diet, especially in rural areas, consists of grains and seeds. Their diet can vary depending on the season. During the breeding season, a large part of their diet is insects. They feed insects to their young. Urban sparrows readily eat commercial birdseed, while sparrows in rural areas may rely more on natural sources of food. It is estimated that a sparrow eats about 15 grains such as rice per day, or about 5,475 grains per year. A sparrow eats about 2.9 kg of food per year. Although this includes a variety of foods, including insects, grains and seeds are a significant part of their diet. Sparrows consume a variety of foods, including grains, seeds, insects, fruits, and scraps.

Citizens began destroying sparrows' nests to scare them away. Noise pollution such as banging pots and pans, creating aggressive sounds, and making loud noises were encouraged to scare them away. The purpose of this method was to stun the birds so that they could not fly and could be easily killed. Due to the violence and excessive pressure in this practice, many of the birds died of exhaustion. The birds began to fall from the sky while flying.

The campaign resulted in the public extermination of large numbers of sparrows. This caused an imbalance in the agricultural sector. The unexpected destruction of the birds gradually led to an increase in the number of pests. This had a direct impact on the agricultural sector. The excessive increase in pests such as locusts devastated crops. This incident taught an important lesson: decisions made without understanding the balance of ecology and ecosystem science can cause long-term damage.

The historical perspective of this campaign shows that development efforts and measures taken for public health can sometimes be uneconomical and destructive, even if they ignore scientific facts and considerations of ecological balance.

The mass extermination of sparrows disrupted the food production system and had unintended consequences. A rapid increase in the number of insects such as locusts destroyed crops. This led to a great famine in China (1959-1961). Millions of people died during this period. It promised to reshape China with the slogan "Man must conquer nature". The results proved disastrous. By the 1960s, the absence of sparrows and other birds had caused serious ecological imbalances. Birds naturally acted as pest controllers, keeping the population of pests that damaged crops and vegetation in balance.

The extermination of sparrows in China has caused ecological imbalance, which has seriously affected the natural environment. To solve this problem, China has tried to reintroduce the Eurasian tree sparrow, which has helped restore the ecological balance. A few years later, the Eurasian tree sparrow species has reappeared in various places in China. This reminds us that it takes continuous time and effort to maintain and improve the ecosystem. It was not easy to completely rebuild these species. It requires a long time and hard efforts, and it also provides evidence that the natural environment can be improved. It is clear that it takes time and hard work to restore the ecological balance.

China's slippery leap forward campaign has taught the world a profound lesson in the importance of science and the long-term impact of environmental disasters. This campaign has been regarded by scholars as a historical tragedy in China. It has taught us an important lesson: it is necessary to pay great attention to the proper protection and management of our ecosystem. This incident raises serious questions about how to prevent such environmental disasters from happening again in the future. It is time for humans to reassess their relationship with the environment.

What we need to learn is that protecting natural resources and the environment is essential not only for our future, but also for the overall ecological balance. If we fail to properly maintain and improve the ecosystem, it may lead to the loss of our natural resources and environmental crises in the future. China's experience warns us that ignoring the long-term effects of environmental disasters and adopting a policy of cheap superficial development can prove dangerous. We all need to understand and contribute to the importance of protecting natural resources and the ecological balance, so that we can avoid such incidents in the future and ensure the long-term health of the Earth.

***