Saturday, Jun 08, 2024 08:45 [IST]
Last Update: Saturday, Jun 08, 2024 03:03 [IST]
The election results on the 2nd of June 2024 came
as a surprise to many in Sikkim. For the first time in Sikkim’s democratic
history, the state had witnessed an election being contested by so many
political parties. While the ruling Sikkim Karntikari Morcha (SKM) was a strong
force – three other parties – Sikkim Democratic Front (SDF), Bharatiya Janta
Party (BJP) and Citizen Action Party (CAP) had also emerged as strong
contenders in the political landscape.
In particular, the grand old party of Sikkim, SDF who had in
the past ruled the state for a record 5 terms was seen to be making a strong
comeback and had run a vigorous campaign with show of strength rallies, mass
public meetings and an aggressive social media campaign. The Party President
Former Chief Minister Pawan Kumar Chamling had even addressed his cadre days
before the counting assuring them that the party will be definitely forming the
government and chalked out plans for what policies he intended to implement
once in power. Even the BJP had run an active campaign and three of its
stalwarts- State Party President, Mr D.R. Thapa, Mr Tseten Tashi Bhutia and Mr
N.K. Subba all claimed to be winning from their seats. Despite CAP being such a
young party, it had also fielded 30 candidates on the 32 legislative seats and
had garnered a following among the public, especially the youth. So, the
feeling was that the opposition would have an impact on the final results this
time.
However, come counting day, from the very first round of
counting, it was clear that SKM had a clear margin in almost all
constituencies. And when the dust finally settled, SKM had secured a historic
second term by winning 31 out of 32 seats, with record margins in most. SDF had
to settle for a lone seat that too won by a candidate who had moved from SKM on
the very day of ticket distribution. This tremendous mandate has not just
secured SKM a second term but has firmly placed it as the strongest political force
in the state barring none while completely decimating any viable opposition in
the state. This will definitely have an impact on the 2029 elections as well.
How Did The Opposition Falter?
Since last year, there had been attempts made by SDF to
unite the various opposition forces to fight as one against SKM. The move was
partly successful with Bhaichung Bhutia merging his Hamro Sikkim Party (HSP)
with SDF but the other opposition parties resisted the move to unite. Hence,
the scattered opposition voices in the state failed to come together and
provide a real option for the public against SKM. The main opposition party SDF
had revived its failing fortunes by creating a new narrative of SDF 2.0 led by
youth with innovative ideas and a new approach to policy making. These young
voices were at the front end of the one and half year campaign run by the party
to present a new version of itself to the public. The Party President had even
promised to give tickets to 80% youth in a media interview.
However, when it came to ticket distribution, hardly any of
these new clean faces in politics were given tickets and the party chose to
raise old trusted party leaders with a previous track record in most
constituencies. When it came to women, the party did not give a single ticket
to any women leaders of the party. This combined with the fact that the party
chose to focus solely on the Party President Mr Chamling as the front face of
the party closer to the election campaign, meant that the party could not
deliver on the SDF 2.0 image it had projected to the public. The public had
already rejected SDF and Mr Chamling in 2019 and its resurgence had mostly
happened due to the new blood and the new ideas which had led the party in the
last one and half years, so going back to its traditional form does not seem to
have appealed to the public who were expecting a much reformed SDF. The fact
that Mr Chamling a veteran political with 40 years of electoral victory under
his belt and the honour of being India’s longest serving Chief Minister could
not even save one of the two seats that he was contesting from, shows a clear
public mandate against him.
As far as BJP goes, it was already fighting against the
traditional backlash against regional parties in Sikkim which has remained a
constant factor since the merger with India. To add to that, it adopted a
combative style of campaigning by raining heavy allegations of corruption and
incompetence against SKM and Chief Minister Mr Prem Singh Tamang (Golay). In
fact, BJP State Incharge Mr Dilip Jaiswal went on to state that there was an
empty cell next to Mr Arvind Kejriwal waiting for Mr Tamang in Tihar Jail, in
one of his public addresses, while party spokespersons repeatedly threatened
the use of the Enforcement Directorate against key SKM figures. This
belligerent and threatening rhetoric against a sitting Chief Minister and local
politicians especially by outsiders does not seem to have gone down well with
the public, given the adverse reactions people have towards national parties in
the state.
Also, BJP had managed to be in the coalition govt. last term
not on its own steam but by taking over 10 SDF MLAs and winning two seats in
the by-elections with the full support of SKM and its cadre. This time, SKM
broke its alliance with BJP just before ticket distribution, while 3 BJP
sitting MLAs resigned from BJP and came over to SKM where they were promptly
given tickets. There was also a mass exodus of party cadre from BJP following
these resignations. This meant a very depleted BJP with a vacuum of leaders as
well as party cadre. If the BJP had decided to focus only on its stalwart
candidates with a good voter base and had only given tickets to them, it would
probably have fared better. Instead, it decided to import candidates from all
parties and walks of life in a last minute effort to file 31 candidates. This
led to a weak on ground campaign in all constituencies which are evident in the
results – all 31 BJP candidates got fewer combined votes that the combined
votes received by Mr Tamang from his two constituencies!
When it comes to CAP, they were already fighting a battle of
perception. Since the launch of the party last year, a narrative was set that
their time had not yet come but maybe they would be fit for 2029. But there was
still hope that the key figure of the party, Mr Ganesh Rai would be victorious
from his home ground – Melli constituency where his wife, Mrs Tulsi Devi Rai
had previously won two terms under SDF. There was also hope that their MP
candidate, Mr Bharat Basnett, former Congress State President and well known in
Sikkim for his pro-Sikkimese stance, could win the lone MP seat as he had been
fighting for Sikkim-centric issues for decades and had popular support. However,
they had an abysmal first innings with only Mr Basnett giving any fight with
the rest of the party garnering less than 6% of the total vote share. This is not unsurprising in a state where
almost 80/85% of the people are directly or indirectly dependent on the govt.
in some way or form. Whether it be for public benefits and schemes, govt. jobs,
bank subsidies, work-orders etc, one needs the recommendation of an elected
representative. Hence when the narrative was already set that they are not
going to form the govt. the public decided to back candidates who they thought
had a chance at forming the govt. This same narrative holds true for the one
strong independent candidate in the fray these polls.
Factors for SKM’s Historic Win
Mr Prem Singh Tamang’s approach can best be described as
hands on. In his last term, he held countless public meets all over Sikkim
where he went directly to the public and met thousands of people at a time
where he sanctioned applications for jobs, Garib Awas Yojna schemes, medical
reimbursements, transfers and the like. These meets allowed him to interact
directly with the public and created an image of him being an accessible and
down to earth Chief Minister. This coupled with his young image put him in stark
contrast to his biggest opponent Mr Chamling, who has had a reputation of being
aloof and unapproachable. Mr Chamling tried very hard to shake off this image
this campaign and went out to the public but a four-decade image is hard to
shake. Sikkim has historically always rallied around the dynamic leadership of
a single leader no matter which party came to power. Mr Nar Bahadur Bhandari
was the reason being the electoral victories of his era while Mr Chamling was
the sole face during his time. Now Mr Tamang seems to have firmly taken that
coveted place in the people’s imagination.
SKM party also cobbled together a good list of candidates
from all walks of life – from former bureaucrats, former MLA’s from other
parties, four women candidates and a balanced representation across all
communities and castes. This balance was missing in all other parties and that
seems to have been the messaging that the public bought.
Also, SKM ran a very balanced campaign against the usual
community politics that had dominated the state for decades. No candidates
asked public for votes based on their community or caste nor did they try and
take the help of community associations during their campaigns. This is evident
in the vote shares across constituencies where SKM candidates have gotten votes
cutting across community lines. This is most evident in Rhenock constituency, a
constituency dominated by Sikkimese Nepali Chettri-Bahuns and traditionally a
bastion for leaders from that constituency. Fears were raised about Mr Tamang’s
candidacy from there that the community might vote in favour of his rival,
based on him being from the same community. But the results show that they
overwhelmingly voted in favour of Mr Tamang and community politics had no role
to play. This marks a total shift in the way politics has been conventionally
played in Sikkim and it will also shape a change in the way future elections
are fought in the state. All these factors plus the advantage of being the
incumbent govt. played a role in the landslide victory enjoyed by SKM these
elections.
SKM has created history with its triumphant win and this
term they find themselves in a comfortable majority with no need of any ally
nor being bogged down by dissidents so it should be able to fulfil its promises
to the people without any pressures from outside political forces. Mr Tamang in
his victory address stressed that he is going to give first priority to Roads,
Drinking Water and Electricity and that he will work hard to fulfil the hopes
and aspirations of the people and make create a ‘Sunawlo Sikkim’ (a
golden state). All of Sikkim is hopeful he will live up to his promise.
(Amrit Sharma has a Masters in English from Hindu
College, Delhi University and a Masters in Mass Communications from M.C.R.C,
Jamia. He worked in NDTV and then went on to Head Communications in
Multi-national companies in Delhi, Spain, Switzerland and U.K. He recently
moved back to Sikkim and currently runs a Homestay in Gangtok. Views are
personal. Email: amritsikkim@gmail.com)