



















Wednesday, Aug 26, 2026 10:30 [IST]
Last Update: Tuesday, Aug 25, 2026 17:21 [IST]
Nepal’s
renewed focus on mountain tourism should offer Sikkim more than just
admiration—it should offer a lesson.
For
Nepal, mountaineering, trekking and adventure tourism are not merely
attractions. They are an important part of the country’s identity, economy and
employment. Yet, despite being an established mountain tourism destination,
Nepal is still looking at policy and legal reforms to make the sector safer,
more organised, sustainable and globally competitive.
The
debate around Nepal’s proposed Tourism Bill 2081 is particularly relevant.
Mountain tourism stakeholders have called for a comprehensive overhaul, arguing
that legislation must provide a long-term national roadmap rather than becoming
largely a mechanism for licences, regulations, penalties and administrative
control. The larger message is clear: mountain tourism needs vision, not just
regulation.
Sikkim
needs to have this conversation too. We have a spectacular mountain landscape,
a rich cultural heritage and enormous potential for trekking and adventure
tourism. Yet our tourism economy remains heavily dependent on a few familiar
destinations and a largely seasonal flow of visitors. Tsomgo and Nathula
continue to dominate the tourism circuit, with many visitors spending barely a
few days in the State before returning. This cannot be the extent of Sikkim’s
tourism ambition.
We
need to identify new destinations, open carefully planned trekking routes and
develop existing ones with better infrastructure. The Yuksom-Goechala-Khangchendzonga
Base Camp trek, for instance, has the potential to become a flagship Himalayan
experience if developed responsibly—with safe trails, strategically located
teahouses, trained local guides, communication networks, emergency facilities
and proper waste-management systems.
This
does not mean turning our mountains into another commercial tourism corridor.
Quite the opposite. Sikkim must learn from both the successes and excesses of
established mountain destinations. Development must remain within the
ecological carrying capacity of our fragile landscape and ensure that mountain
communities benefit directly.
Our mountains are not short-stay sightseeing backdrops. They are an economy, a culture and a way of life. If we continue to sell only Tsomgo and Nathula, we will remain trapped in a narrow, seasonal tourism model. Nepal is already thinking beyond simply attracting more tourists. Sikkim must do the same.